Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Northwest Forest Resource Council v. Portland Audubon Society
492 U.S. 911
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1989-06-26
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that improper bolstering occurred where testimony shows a witness attended a lineup but no evidence that the witness identified the defendant, and the case goes to trial, the logical conclusion is that the witness did identify the defendant.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Northwest Forest Resource Council v. Portland Audubon Society. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 72 opinions
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of Mountain States Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.