Grohs v. Gold Bond Building Products

How later courts describe this case

• “fact that an individual may have been qualified in the past does not mean that he is qualified at a later time.”
• Cir-cuit Court affirmed the nullification of a post-petition transfer of debtor-in-possession’s main asset because transfer was made without requisite notice and hearing under § 363
• fourth prong of prima facie case is that plaintiff “was replaced by a younger person”