Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Rotman v. Worcester Housing Authority
489 U.S. 1027
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1989-02-21
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- court had jurisdiction to correct sentence from that imposed to that required by statute under Rule 35[a] even though appeal pending
- district court has jurisdiction, while appeal of conviction is pending, to correct sentence from the seven years imposed to the minimum sentence of fifteen years prescribed by 18 U.S.C. § 1202(a)(1)
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Rotman v. Worcester Housing Authority. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 21 opinions
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.