Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Wallace v. United States
488 U.S. 867
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1988-10-03
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that a “verdict must be upheld if the evidence adequately supports a finding that a single conspiracy existed.”
- ABA Standards for the Administration of Criminal Justice § 3-3.2(b) requires prosecutor to "`advise the witness concerning possible self-incrimination and the possible need for counsel.' "
- activities of conspirator unrelated to the aims of the conspiracy not attributable to co-conspirators
- “statements made by the defendant” does not include co-conspirator statements, even if those statements can be attributed to the defendant for the purposes of the hearsay rule
- “money launderers play an essential part in a [§ 846] conspiracy”
- The trial judge did not abuse his discretion in determining summary charts would be helpful to the jury and not cumulative; the judge reminded the jury of “their responsibility to determine whether the charts accurately reflected the evidence presented.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Wallace v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 112 opinions
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.