Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
M-Tron Industries, Inc. v. Hillebrand
488 U.S. 1004
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1989-01-09
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- comments not direct evidence of discrimination where plaintiff inferred discriminatory intent from the comment
- “Summary judgments should seldom be used in cases alleging employment discrimination because of the special category in which Congress and the Supreme Court visualized these cases”
- claims based on unauthorized acts (wrongdoing) by the [Government officials sound in tort
- evaluation of witness credibility is exclusive function of the jury
- distinguishing between “direct evidence” case and McDonnell Douglas case
- distinguishing between a “direct evidence” and a McDonnell Douglas case
- distinguishing between “direct evidence” case and McDonnell Douglas ease
- motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed M-Tron Industries, Inc. v. Hillebrand. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 236 opinions
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.