Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

M-Tron Industries, Inc. v. Hillebrand

488 U.S. 1004

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1989-01-09
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • comments not direct evidence of discrimination where plaintiff inferred discriminatory intent from the comment
  • “Summary judgments should seldom be used in cases alleging employment discrimination because of the special category in which Congress and the Supreme Court visualized these cases”
  • claims based on unauthorized acts (wrongdoing) by the [Government officials sound in tort
  • evaluation of witness credibility is exclusive function of the jury
  • distinguishing between “direct evidence” case and McDonnell Douglas case
  • distinguishing between a “direct evidence” and a McDonnell Douglas case
  • distinguishing between “direct evidence” case and McDonnell Douglas ease
  • motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed M-Tron Industries, Inc. v. Hillebrand. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
236 opinions

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.