Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Sodowski v. National Flood Insurance Program of the Federal Emergency Management Agency
486 U.S. 1043
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1988-06-06
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- rejecting Quesada's expansion of the SFIP's coverage as "an act of judicial activism”
- plaintiff not entitled to recover for structural damage caused by soil settlement regardless of the cause of the soil settlement
- the standard flood insurance policy does not provide coverage for losses caused by earth movement even if such movement is caused by flooding
- “Courts are not at liberty to embark upon a broad, undifferentiated mission of vindicating constitutional rights; after all, Article III specifically limits the judicial power of the United States to the resolution of actual cases or controversies.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sodowski v. National Flood Insurance Program of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 44 opinions
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.