Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
H-CHH Associates v. Citizens for Representative Government
485 U.S. 971
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1988-03-21
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- "Any activity seeking to solicit political contributions necessarily interferes with that function by competing with the merchant tenants for the funds of [mall] patrons."
- "A regulating authority may not adopt rules which preclude the exercise of free expression in an appropriate place, even on the ground another place is available. [Citations.]"
- judicial construction of statutory aggravating circumstance could be applied retroactively because defendant not subjected to change in quantum of punishment
- Standridge left question open, holds defendant not denied basic tools of defense
- asMng the jury if the victim had any constitutional guarantees
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed H-CHH Associates v. Citizens for Representative Government. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 91 opinions
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Motions of Pacific Legal Foundation and International Council of Shopping Centers, Inc., et al. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.