Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Fleisher v. City of Signal Hill
Fleisher v. City of Signal Hill, 485 U.S. 961 (1988)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1988-03-21
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- “A court may admit evidence that is the fruit of illegal police conduct if: (1) The evidence would inevitably have been discovered in the course of investigation; (2
- “Rule 11 directs sanctions ‘only when the “pleading, motion or other paper” itself is frivolous, not when one of the arguments in support of a pleading or motion is frivolous.’ ”
- "Unequal administration of facially neutral legislation can result from either misapplication (i.e., departure from or distortion of the law) or selective enforcement (i.e., correct enforcement in only a fraction of cases
- Circuit Judge Kravitch concurring in part and dissenting in part
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Fleisher v. City of Signal Hill. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 97 opinions
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.