Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Flakes v. Wisconsin
484 U.S. 958
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1987-11-16
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- “decisions which fall squarely within the ambit of trial strategy ... if reasonably made, will not constitute a basis for an ineffective assistance claim”
- “Counsel’s decision not to call a witness, if supported by valid tactical considerations, does not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel.”
- “It is common knowledge that defense counsel quite often waive openings as a simple matter of trial strategy.”
- burden of showing substantial prejudice amounting to a miscarriage of justice
- “[T]he fact that [the defendant] ... had no duty to report [the] transactions ... is not the operative issue as to whether he agreed to unlawfully defraud the United States by impairing and obstructing [the IRS’s] lawful governmental function[] of collecting data....”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Flakes v. Wisconsin. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 122 opinions
Ct. App. Wis. Certiorari denied.