Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Flakes v. Wisconsin

484 U.S. 958

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1987-11-16
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • “decisions which fall squarely within the ambit of trial strategy ... if reasonably made, will not constitute a basis for an ineffective assistance claim”
  • “Counsel’s decision not to call a witness, if supported by valid tactical considerations, does not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel.”
  • “It is common knowledge that defense counsel quite often waive openings as a simple matter of trial strategy.”
  • burden of showing substantial prejudice amounting to a miscarriage of justice
  • “[T]he fact that [the defendant] ... had no duty to report [the] transactions ... is not the operative issue as to whether he agreed to unlawfully defraud the United States by impairing and obstructing [the IRS’s] lawful governmental function[] of collecting data....”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Flakes v. Wisconsin. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
122 opinions

Ct. App. Wis. Certiorari denied.