Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Lake Havasu City v. Rancho Disposal Service, Inc.
484 U.S. 1078
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1988-02-22
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- determining that “I have nothing else to say” constituted assertion of right to silence
- determining that “I have nothing 30 else to say” constituted assertion of right to silence
- after an equivocal invocation of the right to silence, Miranda requires cessation of interrogation; only permissible questions were those for purposes of clarification
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lake Havasu City v. Rancho Disposal Service, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 60 opinions
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Kennedy took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.