Lindsay v. City of San Antonio

How later courts describe this case

• predatory price claim rejected where there was no evidence of a “drastically declining price structure” or of increasing concentration in the market (internal quotations and citation omitted)
• court refused to apply below-cost pricing test to only four of the 180 common items that competing specialty food stores sold
• judge’s finding that portable sign ordinance barely improved city’s appearance was wrongful substitution of his judgment for that of city officials