Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Pirovolos v. United States
480 U.S. 926
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1987-03-09
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- applying Moran v. Burbine , supra, with regard to the Fifth and Sixth Amendments
- venireperson excluded for cause after stating unequivocally that he would not take the oath of a juror
- the appellant's death sentence was not disproportionate despite the fact that her husband/accomplice had not been prosecuted for his participation in the victim's murder
- wherein this court found that the same two aggravating circumstances present here outweighed the one statutory mitigating circumstance of age (18 at the time of the offense), and several non-statutory mitigating circumstances
- although a factor to consider when reviewing the proportionality of a death sentence, the fact that the appellant's husband/accomplice had not been prosecuted for his participation in the victim's murder did not render the appellant's death sentence disproportionate
- "The fact that a defendant has legal counsel does not, as a per se rule, prohibit law enforcement officials from procuring a statement of any kind from the appellant, without first giving notice to and receiving consent from his counsel"
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pirovolos v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 102 opinions
C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of petitioner to consolidate case with No. 86-6009, Gregg v. United States, supra, denied. Certiorari before judgment denied.