Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Rosano v. United States

480 U.S. 907

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1987-03-02
Topic
litigation

How later courts describe this case

  • stating that only the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment mandates payment for violations and that all claims founded on other constitutional amendments are outside the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims
  • res judicata barred affirmative defense of fraudulent inducement to enter into a contract when party failed to assert defense before arbitration panel with jurisdiction to hear it
  • party failing to raise fraud defense in prior proceeding foreclosed from bringing later RICO claim based on previously unmentioned allegations of fraud

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Rosano v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
28 opinions

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.