Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Janklow v. Newsweek, Inc.
479 U.S. 883
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1986-10-14
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that Congress intended the § 7201 offense to be an offense separate from the misdemeanors in the Code, so § 7201 is a separate offense from both § 7203 offenses and § 7205 offenses
- concluding that Minnesota would recognize defamation by implication
- "even an argument by counsel that the plaintiff in a tort suit will receive worker's compensation is so prejudicial as to warrant a new trial"
- “[W]e choose here to adopt the four factors suggested in Judge Starr’s scholarly opinion [in Oilman ], and to expand them, for reasons we will explain, to include elements of the concurrence by Judge Bork.”
- "[W]e choose here to adopt the four factors suggested in Judge Starr's scholarly opinion [in Ollman ], and to expand them, for reasons we will explain, to include elements of the concurrence by Judge Bork."
- reaching this conclusion from examination of legislative history
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Janklow v. Newsweek, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 111 opinions
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.