Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Beck v. Missouri
476 U.S. 1140
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1986-05-27
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- interpreting Barrowclough v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc., 752 F.2d 923 (3d Cir.1985)
- listing citations and stating the general principle that " ‘[a] statutory time period is not mandatory unless it both expressly requires an agency or public official to act within a particular time period and specifies a consequence for failure to comply with the provision' ”
- Commonwealth does not violate disclosure requirements of Brady by failing to disclose evidence that it does not have and of which it is not aware
- testimony of appellant’s involvement in drug trafficking admissible to show relationship among parties involved in murder
- prospective juror was properly excluded where juror’s testimony established an irrevocable commitment to vote against the death penalty
- evidence of defendant’s drug dealing with victim’s brother, who had motive for murder, relevant to show previous relationship between parties
- investigatory delay, if reasonable, does not violate due process, even if a defendant is actually prejudiced in the preparation of his defense as a result of the delay
- ”[T]here must be independent evidence — besides the mere invocation of the privilege — upon which to base the negative inference.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Beck v. Missouri. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 151 opinions
Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.