Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Bellissimo v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
475 U.S. 1035
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1986-02-24
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- finding no authority for the contention that “putative class members may piggyback one class action onto another and thus toll the statute of limitations indefinitely”
- applying Texas’ two-year limitation on actions to enforce debts not evidenced by a contract in writing
- sex discrimination claim maintained by in-house counsel against her employer, although attorney-client defense not asserted
- summary judgment granted in favor of employer where female employee failed to show that any similarly situated male employees were treated differently
- dress codes permissible although specific requirements for males and females may differ
- farmer association held joint employer where association had a contract of employment, specified the duration of employment, offered visa petitions, outlined employment conditions, including a work guarantee, an hourly rate guarantee and a transportation allowance
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bellissimo v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 98 opinions
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice O’Connor would grant certiorari.