Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Adams v. United States
474 U.S. 971
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1985-11-04
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- White, J., joined by Burger, C.J., dissenting from a denial of certiorari in a recent RICO conspiracy case
- a Sec. 1962(d) violation need not arise from an agreement that the defendant himself commit the predicate acts
- a § 1962(d) violation need not arise from an agreement that the defendant himself commit the predicate acts
- "the decision to grant immunity is reserved to the discretion of the executive branch."
- count of indictment sufficient although it did not identify specific drug
- “Even if [allegedly newly discovered] evidence could convince the jury to disregard ... [the] testimony [of a particular prosecution witness] ..., the other evidence in the case was more than sufficient to sustain a finding of guilt.”
- court limited cross-examination of witness in the Witness Protection Program
- examining the "context of the entire trial"
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Adams v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 101 opinions
C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.