Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Adams v. United States

474 U.S. 971

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1985-11-04
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • White, J., joined by Burger, C.J., dissenting from a denial of certiorari in a recent RICO conspiracy case
  • a Sec. 1962(d) violation need not arise from an agreement that the defendant himself commit the predicate acts
  • a § 1962(d) violation need not arise from an agreement that the defendant himself commit the predicate acts
  • "the decision to grant immunity is reserved to the discretion of the executive branch."
  • count of indictment sufficient although it did not identify specific drug
  • “Even if [allegedly newly discovered] evidence could convince the jury to disregard ... [the] testimony [of a particular prosecution witness] ..., the other evidence in the case was more than sufficient to sustain a finding of guilt.”
  • court limited cross-examination of witness in the Witness Protection Program
  • examining the "context of the entire trial"

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Adams v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
101 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.