Wasserstrom v. Eisenberg

How later courts describe this case

• upholding that part of a jury instruction that liability requires an affirmative statement coupled with material omissions
• stating that class decertification was inappropriate simply because reliance involved individual questions; district court could have held separate trial on reliance issues
• noting that for claims based on securities laws, “[cjlass actions are a particularly appropriate and desirable means to resolve claims”
• finding that allegations of more than 90 class members satisfied numerosity requirement
• reading part of inaccurate projection was sufficient to support a finding of reliance