Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

McMahon v. Green

474 U.S. 819

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1985-10-07
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • affirming trial court’s refusal to provide interpreter during voir dire to a defendant who had resided in the United States for seven years
  • canine sniff conducted at the door of a person’s dwelling was search requiring warrant based on probable cause
  • “Probable cause to believe certain items will be found in a specific location is a ‘practical, nontechnical conception,’ [citations omitted] that need not be based on direct, first-hand, or ‘hard’ evidence.”
  • consent decree approved by federal district court may not be collaterally attacked in state court on underlying state law issue
  • dog sniff conducted outside door of apartment found to be a search
  • use of drug dog to sniff at door of defendant’s apartment
  • dog sniff outside apartment door constituted a search requiring a warrant
  • dog sniff outside apartment door requires probable cause

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed McMahon v. Green. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
167 opinions

Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Cer-tiorari denied.