Greenspun v. United States

How later courts describe this case

• holding that subpoena duces tecum requiring production of partnership or corporate records did not violate custodians' fifth amendment privilege against compulsory self-incrimination; standing implied
• "[wjhatever limitations are imposed on the state’s general right and duty to see to the education of its youth, the right extends beyond occasional testing”
• "[w]hatever limitations are imposed on the state's general right and duty to see to the education of its youth, the right extends beyond occasional testing"
• the privilege against compulsory self-incrimination is a personal one and no collective entity may claim it