Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Hutchings v. United States
472 U.S. 1031
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1985-06-24
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- " 'augmentation of sentence' based on a defendant's decision to 'stand on [his] right to put the Government to its proof rather than plead guilty' is clearly improper"
- "The '[a]ugmentation of sentence' based on a defendant's decision to 'stand on [his] right to put the Government to its proof rather than plead guilty' is clearly improper." (quoting United States v. Araujo, 539 F.2d 287, 291-92 (2nd Cir.1976))
- “The ‘[augmentation of sentence’ based on a defendant’s decision to ‘stand on [his] right to put the Government to its proof rather than plead guilty is clearly improper.” (quoting United States v. Araujo, 539 F.2d 287, 291— 92 (2nd Cir.1976))
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hutchings v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 31 opinions
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.