Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Raulerson v. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

Raulerson v. Wainwright, Sec’y, Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 469 U.S. 966 (1984)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1984-10-29
Topic
intellectual-property-and-technology

How later courts describe this case

  • "A defendant may waive his right of self-representation by electing to act as co-counsel. See Brown v. Wainwright, 665 F.2d 607, 611 (5th Cir.1982); Chapman v. United States, 553 F.2d 886, 893, n. 12 (5th Cir.1977)."
  • counsel not ineffective where, although he filed no change of venue motion, he did explore the possibility of seeking a change in venue, but after the voir dire examination, he determined that such action would be fruitless
  • “The Hickenlooper exception to the act of state doctrine does not apply to confiscations by a foreign state of the property of its own nationals within its border, since such confiscations are ‘not contrary to international law.’ [citation omitted]”
  • request for self-representation must be unambiguous

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Raulerson v. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
69 opinions

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.