Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Kostadinov v. United States

469 U.S. 881

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1984-10-09
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • noting that Rule 804(b)(1)'s concern for adversarial cross-examination is not present when the government has had a previous opportunity to question a witness during a grand jury hearing
  • noting that requirement that court rule upon validity of witness’ assertion of privilege need not be met when its fulfillment would be mere formalism
  • “it is clear that a witness who is unavailable because he has invoked the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination is unavailable under the terms of 804(a)(1)”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Kostadinov v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
36 opinions

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.