Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Birt v. Montgomery

469 U.S. 874

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1984-10-01
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that ADEA plaintiffs may not recover prejudgment interest if they recover liquidated damages
  • emphasizing the lack of a motion for continuance in rejecting right to counsel of choice claim
  • social security payments by employer included in court’s back pay award in age discrimination case
  • “Essential to effective representation ... is the independent duty to investigate and prepare.”
  • Age Discrimination'in Employment Act (ADEA) case applying FLSA provisions; court held prejudgment interest cannot be awarded if plaintiffs receive liquidated damages
  • trial court erred in granting front pay "instead of" or "rather than" reinstatement
  • 28 U.S.C. § 2254 proceeding in which state failed to respond to court’s order did not require default, notice should be provided to respondent before default

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Birt v. Montgomery. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
113 opinions

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Marshall would grant certiorari.