Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Boileau
469 U.S. 871
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1984-10-01
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- affirming lower court decision which “thoroughly analyzed the evidence on damages in light of the fifteen factors in Georgia-Pacific.”
- absent motion for JNOV, "review for sufficiency of evidence is extremely limited or non-existent” (emphasis added)
- whether motion denied or granted, review follows the path trod by the district court
- in lost profits context: “One who fails to submit evidence in support of a position cannot be heard on appeal to complain that the trial court failed to find facts upholding that position”
- upheld county ordinance granting preferential treatment to blacks in contract bidding
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Boileau. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 137 opinions
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.