Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Minsky v. Auto Driveaway Co.

Minsky v. Auto Driveaway Co., 469 U.S. 1019 (1984)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1984-11-13
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • finding that there is “ ‘no effective way to measure the loss of sales or potential growth — to ascertain the people who don’t knock on the door or to identify the specific persons who do not [return] because of the existence of the infringer’ ”
  • “The usual analysis of a due process claim proceeds sequentially. First, one determines ... whether a protected property interest exists at all. If such an interest is found, one determines what procedures must be followed____”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Minsky v. Auto Driveaway Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
37 opinions

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.