Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Schapansky v. Department of Transportation
469 U.S. 1018
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1984-11-13
- Topic
- bankruptcy
How later courts describe this case
- holding district court order which extended a deadline provided in a consent decree to be "in the nature of a preliminary injunction" and appealable under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292(a)(1)
- holding district court order which extended a deadline provided in a consent decree to be "in the nature of a preliminary injunction" and appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1)
- less than thirty day statutory notice period not harmful error when there was reasonable cause to believe a crime had been committed
- six day rather than statutory seven day reply period not harmful error
- “A court possesses inherent power to modify its consent decree.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Schapansky v. Department of Transportation. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 77 opinions
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 84-258, 735 F. 2d 477 (first case), 735 F. 2d 488 (second case), 735 F. 2d 504 (third case), 735 F. 2d 524 (fourth case), 735 F. 2d 516 (fifth case), 735 F. 2d 526 (sixth case); No. 84-259, 735 F. 2d 537.