Fuentes v. Michigan

How later courts describe this case

• stating the language of the Commonwealth Coatings opinion suggesting that arbitrators are held to the same ethical standards as judges is dictum
• stating disqualification might be warranted “[i]f circumstances are such that a man of average probity might reasonably be suspected of partiality,” but adding, “the circumstances must be powerfully suggestive of bias ... ”
• "The standards for judicial intervention are narrowly ... drawn to assure the basic integrity of the arbitration process without meddling in it."
• both an arbitrator and the president of one of the parties formerly had been employed by another company