Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Cotner v. Gardner
461 U.S. 918
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1983-05-02
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- implying into plan requirement of 29 U.S.C. § 1053(a) that rights vest at normal retirement age
- “ERISA itself does not contain a definition of ‘anniversary.’ This omission, in a complex statute replete with defined terms, suggests that the ordinary meaning of the word was intended”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Cotner v. Gardner. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 16 opinions
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.