Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Newton v. Federal Barge Lines, Inc.

461 U.S. 914

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1983-05-02
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that “the institution of the plaintiffs suit tolls or suspends the running of the statute of limitations governing a compulsory counterclaim.”
  • offsetting against plaintiff's gross damages "the amount which plaintiffs would have paid ... in the absence of the royalty-maintenance conspiracy"
  • "[T]he heretofore unbroken rule has been that any settlement payments are deducted from the damages awarded after trebling"
  • 10-day statutory stay does not apply to closure of state chartered savings and loan association by federal receiver; due process satisfied by state law providing for possibility of post-seizure judicial review
  • in holding that antitrust counterclaims were compulsory counterclaims to original action asserting breach of a licensing agreement, the court distinguished Mercoid on its facts and stated that Mercoid’s “continuing validity is open to serious question”
  • settlement deductions made after trebling in antitrust cases

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Newton v. Federal Barge Lines, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
88 opinions

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.