Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Newton v. Federal Barge Lines, Inc.
461 U.S. 914
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1983-05-02
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that “the institution of the plaintiffs suit tolls or suspends the running of the statute of limitations governing a compulsory counterclaim.”
- offsetting against plaintiff's gross damages "the amount which plaintiffs would have paid ... in the absence of the royalty-maintenance conspiracy"
- "[T]he heretofore unbroken rule has been that any settlement payments are deducted from the damages awarded after trebling"
- 10-day statutory stay does not apply to closure of state chartered savings and loan association by federal receiver; due process satisfied by state law providing for possibility of post-seizure judicial review
- in holding that antitrust counterclaims were compulsory counterclaims to original action asserting breach of a licensing agreement, the court distinguished Mercoid on its facts and stated that Mercoid’s “continuing validity is open to serious question”
- settlement deductions made after trebling in antitrust cases
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Newton v. Federal Barge Lines, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 88 opinions
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.