Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Newton v. Federal Barge Lines, Inc.

Newton v. Fed. Barge Lines, Inc., 461 U.S. 914 (1983)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1983-05-02
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that “the institution of the plaintiffs suit tolls or suspends the running of the statute of limitations governing a compulsory counterclaim.”
  • offsetting against plaintiff's gross damages "the amount which plaintiffs would have paid ... in the absence of the royalty-maintenance conspiracy"
  • "[T]he heretofore unbroken rule has been that any settlement payments are deducted from the damages awarded after trebling"
  • 10-day statutory stay does not apply to closure of state chartered savings and loan association by federal receiver; due process satisfied by state law providing for possibility of post-seizure judicial review
  • in holding that antitrust counterclaims were compulsory counterclaims to original action asserting breach of a licensing agreement, the court distinguished Mercoid on its facts and stated that Mercoid’s “continuing validity is open to serious question”
  • settlement deductions made after trebling in antitrust cases

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Newton v. Federal Barge Lines, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
88 opinions

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.