Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Bothke v. Commissioner

459 U.S. 859

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1982-10-04
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • prohibiting a plaintiff from amending the complaint after discovery was concluded and a summary judgment motion had been prepared
  • disregarding factual assertions, made after motion for summary judgment, which contradicted earlier statements
  • disregarding factual claims made by the plaintiff after the defendant moved for summary judgment “where those claims contradict statements made previously by [the plaintiff] at his deposition ...”
  • finding it proper to "disregard those factual claims made by [the plaintiff] after [the defendant] moved for summary judgment, where those claims contradict statements made previously by [the plaintiff] at his deposition, in his affidavits, and in response to defendants' interrogatories”
  • disregarding affidavit that conflicted with earlier testimony

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bothke v. Commissioner. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
57 opinions

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.