Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Bothke v. Commissioner
459 U.S. 859
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1982-10-04
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- prohibiting a plaintiff from amending the complaint after discovery was concluded and a summary judgment motion had been prepared
- disregarding factual assertions, made after motion for summary judgment, which contradicted earlier statements
- disregarding factual claims made by the plaintiff after the defendant moved for summary judgment “where those claims contradict statements made previously by [the plaintiff] at his deposition ...”
- finding it proper to "disregard those factual claims made by [the plaintiff] after [the defendant] moved for summary judgment, where those claims contradict statements made previously by [the plaintiff] at his deposition, in his affidavits, and in response to defendants' interrogatories”
- disregarding affidavit that conflicted with earlier testimony
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bothke v. Commissioner. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 57 opinions
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.