Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
McCallum v. United States
459 U.S. 1010
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1982-11-08
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that federal rules of evidence concerning hearsay do not apply to probation revocation hearings
- roving patrol in remote, sparsely populated rural area condoned to thwart rash of burglaries
- postjudgment interest allowed from date of original judgment on antitrust counterclaim, no discussion of prejudgment interest award
- letter from parolee’s job coordinator to probation officer regarding parolee’s tardiness and absenteeism admissible because it was an official report and reliability was established by probationer’s corroboration
- “Where the degree of substitutability in production is high, cross-elasticities of supply will also be high, and ... the two commodities in question should be treated as part of the same market.”
- appeal of trial court judgment
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed McCallum v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 113 opinions
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.