Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Hicks v. Rose
455 U.S. 992
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1982-03-01
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- observing that defendant’s “claim to pretrial bail was moot once he was convicted” (emphasis in original)
- “To succeed on a claim of double jeopardy, a defendant must show that in law and fact the two offenses charged are in reality the same.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hicks v. Rose. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 59 opinions
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.