Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Gartner v. California

Gartner v. Cal., 451 U.S. 945 (1981)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1981-04-27
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • rejecting cost-cutting rationale for school board policy that restricted teacher hiring to persons with less than five years’ experience
  • upholding trial court's refusal to grant reinstatement under theory that jury's damage award equal to one-year's salary amounted to finding that teacher subject to unlawful failure to hire under ADEA was deprived of only one year's employment
  • allowing age discrimination claim based on disparate income shown by statistical evidence
  • school district committed age discrimination by replacing a 55 year old teacher two weeks after she began work
  • Rehnquist, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari and questioning whether a discriminatory impact claim may be brought under the ADEA
  • refusal to hire persons with more than five years experience inevitably excludes older teachers
  • applying disparate impact theory to ADEA age discrimination claims
  • Rehnquist, J,, dissenting from the denial of certiorari

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Gartner v. California. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
141 opinions

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

Justice Brennan and Justice Stewart would grant certiorari.