Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Gartner v. California
Gartner v. Cal., 451 U.S. 945 (1981)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1981-04-27
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- rejecting cost-cutting rationale for school board policy that restricted teacher hiring to persons with less than five years’ experience
- upholding trial court's refusal to grant reinstatement under theory that jury's damage award equal to one-year's salary amounted to finding that teacher subject to unlawful failure to hire under ADEA was deprived of only one year's employment
- allowing age discrimination claim based on disparate income shown by statistical evidence
- school district committed age discrimination by replacing a 55 year old teacher two weeks after she began work
- Rehnquist, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari and questioning whether a discriminatory impact claim may be brought under the ADEA
- refusal to hire persons with more than five years experience inevitably excludes older teachers
- applying disparate impact theory to ADEA age discrimination claims
- Rehnquist, J,, dissenting from the denial of certiorari
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Gartner v. California. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 141 opinions
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Justice Brennan and Justice Stewart would grant certiorari.