Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

OKC Corp. v. Williams

OKC Corp. v. Williams, 449 U.S. 952 (1980)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1980-11-03
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • declining to reach constitutional issues because SEC did not obtain materials by improper means
  • provision of Energy and Water Development Act authorizing Tennessee Valley Authority to impound Tellico River notwithstanding requirements of Endangered Species Act or "any other law"
  • government decision to flood tribal lands for reservoir did not infringe on Cherokee Tribe’s First Amendment rights
  • the fact that Cherokees have no written creeds or houses of worship are of little import when construing the individual beliefs-of the plaintiffs religion
  • although trial court failed to inquire and waiver letter from Oteri & Weinberg inadequate, prejudice not likely
  • Where Mississippi statute did not provide damages for retaliatory firing, this Court had to “decide [the] issue as we believe a Mississippi court would decide it.” (citation omitted)
  • “An amendment to an existing statute is not an acknowl-edgement by Congress that the original statute is invalid. It is a common and customary legislative procedure to enact amendments strengthening and clarifying existing laws.”
  • elements required under Texas law

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed OKC Corp. v. Williams. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
107 opinions

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.