Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
OKC Corp. v. Williams
OKC Corp. v. Williams, 449 U.S. 952 (1980)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1980-11-03
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- declining to reach constitutional issues because SEC did not obtain materials by improper means
- provision of Energy and Water Development Act authorizing Tennessee Valley Authority to impound Tellico River notwithstanding requirements of Endangered Species Act or "any other law"
- government decision to flood tribal lands for reservoir did not infringe on Cherokee Tribe’s First Amendment rights
- the fact that Cherokees have no written creeds or houses of worship are of little import when construing the individual beliefs-of the plaintiffs religion
- although trial court failed to inquire and waiver letter from Oteri & Weinberg inadequate, prejudice not likely
- Where Mississippi statute did not provide damages for retaliatory firing, this Court had to “decide [the] issue as we believe a Mississippi court would decide it.” (citation omitted)
- “An amendment to an existing statute is not an acknowl-edgement by Congress that the original statute is invalid. It is a common and customary legislative procedure to enact amendments strengthening and clarifying existing laws.”
- elements required under Texas law
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed OKC Corp. v. Williams. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 107 opinions
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.