Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Carter v. United States
445 U.S. 931
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1980-03-17
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- "The Government is not obligated by Rule 16(a) to anticipate every possible defense, assume what the defendant's trial testimony (if he decides to testify
- “The Government is not obligated by Rule 16(a) to anticipate every possible defense, assume what the defendant’s trial testimony ... will be, and then furnish him with otherwise irrelevant material that might conflict with his testimony.”
- "The Government is not obligated by Rule 16(a) to anticipate every possible defense, assume what the defendant's trial testimony (if he decides to testify) will be, and then furnish him with otherwise irrelevant material that might conflict with his testimony."
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Carter v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 8 opinions
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.