Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Posner v. United States

445 U.S. 927

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1980-03-17
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • noting that other courts had dealt with the issue, the Court declined defendant’s invitation to re-consider the constitutionality of RICO
  • setting forth standards for determining “[wjhether a congressionally generated document has become an agency record”
  • permitting the inclusion of a group of corporations as an enterprise even though a group of corporations is not a group of individuals associated-in-faet within the meaning of the definition of enterprise
  • affirming under Exemption 3 district judge’s decision based upon Exemption l
  • in view of the broad construction of RICO, a group of corporations can form an enterprise
  • “RICO poses a danger of abuse [through] attempts to apply the statute to situations for which it was not primarily intended.”
  • RICO criminal forfeiture statute which keys forfeiture to the magnitude of a defendant's criminal enterprise, does not violate eighth amendment's proportionality requirement
  • for Eighth Amendment purposes, “there is no substantial difference between an in rem proceeding and a[n in personam criminal] forfeiture proceeding brought directly against the owner”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Posner v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
264 opinions

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.