Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Stanley v. Zant
444 U.S. 1103
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1980-02-19
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- Defense psychiatrist could not testify that, due to personality disorder, complainant cannot determine the truth when she's testifying
- “discretion is vested in the trial court to determine, subject to the rules of evidence governing admissibility, the evidence which may be adduced in mitigation of the offense”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Stanley v. Zant. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 52 opinions
Sup. Ct. Ga.;
Sup. Ct. Ga.;
Sup. Ct. Ga.;
Sup. Ct. Ga.; and
Sup. Ct. Va. Cer-tiorari denied. Reported below: No. 79-5830, 244 Ga. 260, 260 S. E. 2d 465; No. 79-5861, 220 Va. 243, 257 S. E. 2d 797.