Frezzo Bros. v. United States

How later courts describe this case

• having established that district court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, petitioner "faces the additional hurdle of showing that mandamus is the appropriate remedy"
• finding no cost-plus equivalent where gasoline retailers were forced to vary their prices in relation to fixed wholesale prices
• “Absent some indication that the antagonism between co-defendants misled or confused the jury, the mere fact that co-defendants blame each other does not compel severance”
• “Absent some indication that the antagonism between co-defendants misled or confused the jury, the mere fact that co-defendants attempt to blame each other does not compel severance.”
• “a future injury of uncertain date and incalculable magnitude is irreparable harm, and protection from such an injury is a legitimate end of injunctive rehef’
• state court had issued broad injunction against a boycott organized to protest racial discrimination
• corporate defendant fined; individual defendants fined and sentenced to thirty days in jail
• exhaustion requirement permits agency to make decisions within its areas of expertise