Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Mallery v. Blackburn
442 U.S. 940
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1979-06-18
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that officers did not violate the Fourth Amendment by listening to the accused's conversation through a motel wall
- concluding that the term nonforfeitable is identical with the term vested
- observing, even as to one-time appearance on property, “It is a bit disquieting that we must countenance federal snooping around farmers’ barns as a legitimate investigative technique”
- “It has long been settled that the question of materiality in a penury or false statement case is one of law for the courts to decide.”
- deeds conveying land to United States provided actual notice to sellers
- "Except as limited by the constitution its power is plenary"
- “[W]e have upheld the dismissal of an indictment only in very limited and extreme circumstances. In such cases, there was a need either to eliminate prejudice to a defendant in a criminal prosecution, where it was impossible to do so by imposition of lesser sanctions ... ”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mallery v. Blackburn. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 168 opinions
Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied.