Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Matthews v. United States

440 U.S. 972

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1979-03-26
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • explaining that where "prosecutorial overreaching” is present the interests protected by the Double Jeopardy Clause outweigh society's interest in conducting a second trial ending in acquittal or conviction
  • certified documents from Missouri Department of Revenue showing ownership of automobile admissible as public record
  • reasonable possibility that error materially affected the verdict
  • "affecting outcome" test synonymous with harmless error standard

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Matthews v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
62 opinions

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.