Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Thompson v. Covington Housing Development Corp.

439 U.S. 1116

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1979-01-15
Topic
finance

How later courts describe this case

  • discussing factors relevant to determining whether the named plaintiff may appoint new counsel to appeal the approval of a settlement negotiated by former class counsel
  • counseling against redeciding questions "absent the most cogent reasons such as the avoidance of manifest injustice"
  • experience prerequisite for eligibility for apprenticeship program and on-the-job training found .to perpetuate effects of past discrimination; district court ordered to consider whether experience prerequisite should be shortened
  • “To be sure, the assent of named Plaintiffs is not a prerequisite to court approval.”
  • previous panel determination not binding in light of intervening Supreme Court decision
  • acceptors of individual back pay tender do not waive rights to appeal
  • simultaneous negotiations "weigh heavily" against settlement approval
  • backpay and reinstatement available under Title VII

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Thompson v. Covington Housing Development Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
220 opinions

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.