Waller v. United States

How later courts describe this case

• Ewing “does not give the defendant the right to present an unopposed Rule 35 motion. The government violates Ewing only when its opposition violates the essence of the plea bargain.”
• jury could conclude that transfer was an integral part of the illegal interstate movement even though stolen goods came to rest in one state
• Congress’ delegation to Attorney General and his subdelegation to DEA is not unconstitutionally vague nor does it violate the doctrine of separation of powers
• drug control standards established by the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act
• juror with difficulty understanding English language
• federal UCSA involves no improper delegation