Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Geisinger v. Board of County Commissioners
435 U.S. 905
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1978-02-27
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- "the giving of multiple `Allen' charges is to be avoided and may constitute reversible error..."
- “the preferable rule is to uphold the trial judge’s exercise of discretion unless he acts arbitrarily or irrationally”
- jury instructed that "[i]t is important that a decision ... be reached here, and I really see no good reasons why a decision cannot be reached"
- harmless error analysis applies when trial judge answers jury's note without defendant or his counsel being present
- second deadlock instruction upheld after an 11-1 split for conviction, known to the trial court, continued and a signed note by the holdout juror delivered to the court
- introduction of gun to establish bank robbery defendant’s identity and opportunity, held permissible
- affirming decision to give second modified Allen charge
- two ABA instructions not reversible error
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Geisinger v. Board of County Commissioners. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 137 opinions
Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.