Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. v. Bravman
434 U.S. 823
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1977-10-03
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- reversing the district court’s granting of summary judgment which held that restrictions imposed on an agent cannot violate the antitrust laws
- “Suspicion, conjecture and speculation are not enough.... The purported fact issue must be actual rather than theoretical, real rather than imaginary.”
- a challenge to a district court order dismissing a claim against a corporation for the actions of its employees is moot after a verdict is delivered in favor of the employees
- agency not required to initiate rulemaking when resulting rules merely describe controlling provisions
- exclusive dealing requirement to be examined under rule of reason
- specific intent to monopolize must relate to a specific market
- design of streets and control of traffic flow
- standing determined by "factual matrix"
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. v. Bravman. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 138 opinions
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 552 F. 2d 90.