Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Sendak v. Arnold
429 U.S. 968
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1976-11-29
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- finding “[t]he -Attorney General thus has broad powersin the enforcement of criminal laws of the state, and is accordingly a proper defendant.”
- Dissent by Justice White, with whom Chief Justice Burger and Justice Rehnquist joined.
- abortion-neutral regulation of clinic licensing
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sendak v. Arnold. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 33 opinions
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. S. D. Ind.