Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional Services

429 U.S. 823

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1976-10-04
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that there was no interception when the police listened to a tape of a telephone conversation previously recorded by one of the parties to the conversation
  • enforcingan arbitration award of damages where the employer violated the collective bargaining agreement’s subcontracting clause by hiring a subcontractor who had no contact with the union
  • none of valid objectives of inventory search require officers to play cassette tapes found in vehicle
  • section 301 contract action not precluded by section 10(k) ruling where former not inconsistent with latter
  • “The exemption applies, then, even if the purpose of the conversation is criminal, as long as the purpose of the recording is not.”
  • in evaluating the validity of trade practices in connection with a franchise, "`the underlying issues are economic as much as legal'"
  • 30.8% of the Whites passed exam while only 7.7% of the Blacks passed the exam for promotion to Correction Sergeant.
  • despite conflict between collective bargaining agreement and NLRB work jurisdiction award, court did not void contract and enjoin arbitration

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional Services. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
232 opinions

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.