Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Canadian Parkhill Pipe Stringing, Ltd. v. United States
Canadian Parkhill Pipe Stringing, Ltd. v. United States, 429 U.S. 1040 (1977)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1977-01-10
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that where “defendant did not request a continuance or in any way claim that he was unable adequately to prepare to meet the rebuttal testimony [it] further militates against a finding that he was prejudiced by it.”
- District Court Opinion by Weinstein, J., whose superb treatise on evidence similarly addresses the subject at 4 J. Weinstein, Evidence 803(24)[01] (1975
- where the Court noted that “[c]oncealment and falsity were bound together in the context” of that case
- especially Judge Weinstein’s opinion for the district court
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Canadian Parkhill Pipe Stringing, Ltd. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 95 opinions
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.