Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Atwell v. Kelley
426 U.S. 919
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1976-06-07
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that § 2000e-16 of Title VII applied to claim by white federal employee that he suffered racial discrimination in response to his representation of black fellow employee
- holding that a back pay award against the Board of Regents of Stephen F. Austin State University and its president, in his official capacity, was barred by the Eleventh Amendment
- unwavering custom of promoting in exact order of rank on promotion roster gave rise to entitlement
- unrestricted right to sue in "any court" construed as waiver where status of university's financial relationship with state unclear
- suit permitted due to waiver explicit in University’s charter allowing suit “in any court of law or equity”
- District Court’s finding of a protected interest not clearly erroneous where “ ‘objective' evidence’ ” supported plaintiffs expectation of continued employment
- oral assurances that alien faculty member had de facto tenure satisfied Perry even though he had previously not been eligible under state law
- agency record can be reviewed de novo on a motion for summary judgment to determine whether any genuine issue of fact exists as to discrimination
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Atwell v. Kelley. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 113 opinions
Ct. App. Mich. Certiorari denied.