Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Atwell v. Kelley

426 U.S. 919

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1976-06-07
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that § 2000e-16 of Title VII applied to claim by white federal employee that he suffered racial discrimination in response to his representation of black fellow employee
  • holding that a back pay award against the Board of Regents of Stephen F. Austin State University and its president, in his official capacity, was barred by the Eleventh Amendment
  • unwavering custom of promoting in exact order of rank on promotion roster gave rise to entitlement
  • unrestricted right to sue in "any court" construed as waiver where status of university's financial relationship with state unclear
  • suit permitted due to waiver explicit in University’s charter allowing suit “in any court of law or equity”
  • District Court’s finding of a protected interest not clearly erroneous where “ ‘objective' evidence’ ” supported plaintiffs expectation of continued employment
  • oral assurances that alien faculty member had de facto tenure satisfied Perry even though he had previously not been eligible under state law
  • agency record can be reviewed de novo on a motion for summary judgment to determine whether any genuine issue of fact exists as to discrimination

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Atwell v. Kelley. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
113 opinions

Ct. App. Mich. Certiorari denied.