Alexander v. Buckley

How later courts describe this case

• claim that employment of single doctor to operate the radiology department invokes the Sherman Act termed “frivolous”
• Puerto Rican squatters’ claim to a privacy interest in Commonwealth land was “ludicrous” because they had twice been asked to vacate the property
• court dismisses as “frivolous” radiologist claim that the hospital’s termination of his oral contract amounted to a reduction of his staff privileges, invoking hospital bylaws’ procedural requirement.
• squatters on farmland owned by Commonwealth of Puerto Rico lacked Fourth Amendment reasonable expectation of privacy to support injunction protecting their homes
• fourth amendment constraints on government as law enforcer may be greater than as landowner
• squatters on public land had no reasonable expectation of privacy in area they occupied
• Waiver of conflict where codefendants were represented by the same attorney